Tick Tock Tick Tock

WELCOME TO THE NO BS ZONE OF TEDDY JACOBSON

ADDED TUESDAY / 3-28-06
http://www.defensereview.com/article326.html

http://defensetech.org/

www.jtf.org

www.rabbiyess.com

www.kolisrael.com

www.thetrumpet.com

www.hallindsey.com


DISCLAIMER: THIS COMMENTARY AS WELL AS ALL (6 Bloggers) MY PREVIOUS COMMENTARIES ARE MY PERSONAL OPINION AND MY PERSONAL VIEWPOINT ONLY. WHEN I QUOTE SOME ONE IT IS COPIED AND PASTED FROM A PUBLIC DOMAIN OF ONE KIND OR ANOTHER. I DO PAY FOR SOME DETAILED INTELLIGENCE REPORTS THAT I SHARE WITH YOU. IF YOU CAN NOT DEAL WITH REALITY, PLEASE LEAVE NOW.

www.actionsbyt.com/

www.actionsbyt.blogspot.com/

www.tacticalknives.blogspot.com/

www.commentsbyt.blogspot.com/

www.tjofsugarland.blogspot.com/

www.truthaboutparts.blogspot.com/

www.handgunpartsforsale.blogspot.com/


Last night I saw an old broadcast of George Carlin on cable TV and it was from 1999, and he talked a great deal about Sales and Generic BS in America. Unfortunately it is now worse than ever, and pertaining to the gun business and people and the BS is beyond belief. I have been thinking a great deal about all the lies and deceit I read about guns and gun sales and publications that never met a gun they did not like especially if it was made by a paid advertiser. Now you contend with every BS artist on the major gun forums or chat rooms that is a closet "expoit". Of course they never reveal their real names and or post their phone numbers, they hide behind the cloak of secrecy that this internet provides. We must thank Al Gore for inventing our current medium.

I for one get calls from all over the world. If they did not like what I have to say about their pruducts you would think they would call me to discuss it, they never do because I have told you the truth from day one. My pictures that I post on www.truthaboutparts.blogspot.com
say it all. I have a great many more pictures to post for you to agonize over. You must remember that many people using anomymous names may be working with an agenda and you will never know the real truth from these chat rooms as to their real identity. They indeed may be factory owners and or factory employees.

The reason that I named this posting TICK TOCK TICK TOCK is that you have to be a moron not to realize how badly things are going around the world. Now your security is checked by Huticheson Whampoa which is connected to the Chinese Military, that is an old story as the Panama Canal is run by the very same company and I believe our long beach naval ship yard has been leased to them under uncle "BILL"... The biggest seaport in the world is in Grand Bahama Island off the coast of Florida and it is also run by the very same company. Now these very same people will be checking your cargo for "NUKES" -- good luck...

What really bothers me is many of you people are still demanding cheap handgun prices and you will not spend a dime in refining your carry gun when you have the money to buy more garbage handguns. WHAT PRICE DO YOU PUT ON YOUR LIFE ??? Its clear to me that you do not take any of this seriously and you go and buy the very cheapest ammunition and parts and springs and I do not feel sorry for you when your gun goes click instead of bang. Every gun manufacturer out there knows how to improve their product but they will not for one reason or another, you see they do not call me and challenge me about the junk they sell. They do not want to hear the truth but alot of the problem lies with the consumer.

I want the best money can buy. I want the best parts and springs in my brand new gun in the box. I want the best ammunition money can buy. What will all you smart guys do if they add a chemical to every bullet and all powder and primers giving it a 2 years shelf life then it becomes inert. How will you smart guys get around that obstacle ?? You tell me cause I would like to know. I am not as smart as many of you out there, because I never look for a bargain, I never bought cheap ammunition, I never bought cheap knives or supplies. You are a whole lot smarter than I am. I spend the extra money for better parts and springs and I realize that every semi auto is at the mercy of good quality ammunition and superior springs.

These manufacturers would never tell you about the return warranty PERCENTAGE rate because of malfunctioning or inferior handguns or rifles. Look at some of these 2000 dollar 1911 "PRODUCTION HANDGUNS" where you need a helper to pull back the slide and many manufacturers will tell you that OH- YOU MUST SHOOT 5000 ROUNDS IN IT TO BREAK IT IN..... This is total BS, My $400.00 Springfield Armory mil-spec works better and has a better frame to slide fit than their two thousand dollar pistol. Read Master Gun Writer Steve Camps article on his mil-spec SA 1911 at www.hipowersandhandguns.com It has had over 3000 rounds of quality ammunition through it already and it never missed a beat. He has installed the very best springs money can buy.

Don't like what I am saying, well then leave now cause no one forces you to come here and realize you actually believe the schmuck in your mirror. I have no reason to lie as I have no personal agenda as my health declines I will be going to a place where I will not need my handgun or rifle. I never lie to myself. I am trying to wake you all up to see the light of day and smell the roses before its too late.

WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WANTS TO CARRY A MOUSE GUN FOR THEIR PRIMARY WEAPON ?? ARE YOU NUTS ?? There is nothing wrong with your mouse gun as a third piece hidden on your person. IT GOES NO FURTHER. If you want to believe the BS you take the chance of being carried by 6 instead of being tried by 12. A tiny Mouse gun = "IT IS WHAT IT IS"...... I will never forget when I fired a brand new "BAUER" which was a stainless steel copy of the baby browning and it cracked in my left hand on the first shot. I will never forget when I fired a "STERLING" and the entire extractor blew out when I fired it in my left hand.

I will never forget when I fired a brand new stainless steel "BUDICHOWSKY" mouse gun and it went click instead of bang. Is this what your life is worth ?? You have put the price on your life, not me. I get calls about Rossi revolvers all the time and I know them quite well, they are a wonderful paper weight but I do not own one. You have got to start asking yourself what your life is worth because only you can answer that question as the clock is ticking and sooner or later all hell is coming. I look at this world as a runaway train with no brakes and it is out of control.

I speak with quite a few people from the New Orleans area and unless you own a firearm you will become a victim. I think everyone should be made to see the beheadings to understand what your enemies want to do to you. I suggest you go to www.michaelsavage.com He has all the video links you can stand.

It is my personal opinion that the smallest caliber you should rely on as your primary weapon is the 38 special or the 9mm Luger. Faghetabout using a mouse gun as a primary weapon, its just not common sense to me. If you use too large a caliber it can be just as bad as one to small. Try shooting your favorite 44 magnum in an enclosed area and you will blow out your ear drums. Try listening to the BS on the forums where they tell you to buy an odd caliber handgun like you are a MORON. How will you ever get ammunition after they shut it all down if we get attacked, remember our officials have even told you its "WHEN" not "IF"... Prepare for the worst scenario now and you just may survive.

The very best buy in AMERICA for a handgun is still the "MAKAROV".. they have gone up some what in price but they are still very reasonable and if you get one for 300 dollars and buy a couple of thousand rounds of well made ammunition you will be all set. The East German Makarov is still the best of the lot but they are getting harder to find.

If you want the best currently made revolvers you must buy the Ruger SP101 or the GP100. They have not cheapened the internals like their competition. It really amazes me how some of these companies have remained in business all these years because of the percentage of return rate they get back for producing an inferior weapon and their employees do not care enough because of their lack of money and they are not craftsmen. To find craftsmen you must go to your local cemetary. I am not in bed with any company and they do not influence my writings as I do not accept any free guns. I never claimed to be Mr. Personality.

The Clock is TICKING and time is running out. I will try and keep you up with my opinions as frequently as I can, remember I type all this with my one bird finger. It takes time and I try and keep up with all six of my bloggers. For those that want to see and understand how well known I am you can go to www.google.com
Do a search on Teddy Jacobson...


Teddy



U.S. Hiring Hong Kong Co. to Scan Nukes

March 23, 2006By TED BRIDIS and JOHN SOLOMONAssociated PressYahoo News

WASHINGTON - In the aftermath of the Dubai ports dispute, the Bush administration is hiring a Hong Kong conglomerate to help detect nuclear materials inside cargo passing through the Bahamas to the United States and elsewhere.Photo: This undated photograph provided by the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration shows a specialized radiation detector, known as a 'modified straddle carrier,' scanning cargo containers for evidence of radioactive materials at a seaport in the Bahamas.

The radiation detectors are the white panels mounted vertically, right, on the front of the vehicle. (AP Photo/U.S. Nuclear National Security Administration) The administration acknowledges the no-bid contract with Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. represents the first time a foreign company will be involved in running a sophisticated U.S. radiation detector at an overseas port without American customs agents present.Freeport in the Bahamas is 65 miles from the U.S. coast, where cargo would be likely to be inspected again.

The contract is currently being finalized.The administration is negotiating a second no-bid contract for a Philippine company to install radiation detectors in its home country, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. At dozens of other overseas ports, foreign governments are primarily responsible for scanning cargo.While President Bush recently reassured Congress that foreigners would not manage security at U.S. ports, the Hutchison deal in the Bahamas illustrates how the administration is relying on foreign companies at overseas ports to safeguard cargo headed to the United States.Hutchison Whampoa is the world's largest ports operator and among the industry's most-respected companies.

It was an early adopter of U.S. anti-terror measures. But its billionaire chairman, Li Ka-Shing, also has substantial business ties to China's government that have raised U.S. concerns over the years."Li Ka-Shing is pretty close to a lot of senior leaders of the Chinese government and the Chinese Communist Party," said Larry M. Wortzel, head of a U.S. government commission that studies China security and economic issues.

But Wortzel said Hutchison operates independently from Beijing, and he described Li as "a very legitimate international businessman.""One can conceive legitimate security concerns and would hope either theHomeland Security Department or the intelligence services of the United States work very hard to satisfy those concerns," Wortzel said.Three years ago, the Bush administration effectively blocked a Hutchison subsidiary from buying part of a bankrupt U.S. telecommunications company, Global Crossing Ltd., on national security grounds.And a U.S. military intelligence report, once marked "secret," cited Hutchison in 1999 as a potential risk for smuggling arms and other prohibited materials into the United States from the Bahamas.

Hutchison's port operations in the Bahamas and Panama "could provide a conduit for illegal shipments of technology or prohibited items from the West to the PRC (People's Republic of China), or facilitate the movement of arms and other prohibited items into the Americas," the now-declassified assessment said.The CIA currently has no security concerns about Hutchison's port operations, and the administration believes the pending deal with the foreign company would be safe, officials said.Supervised by Bahamian customs officials, Hutchison employees will drive the towering, truck-like radiation scanner that moves slowly over large cargo containers and scans them for radiation that might be emitted by plutonium or a radiological weapon.

Any positive reading would set off alarms monitored simultaneously by Bahamian customs inspectors at Freeport and by U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials working at an anti-terrorism center 800 miles away in northern Virginia. Any alarm would prompt a closer inspection of the cargo, and there are multiple layers of security to prevent tampering, officials said."The equipment operates itself," said Bryan Wilkes, a spokesman for the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration, the agency negotiating the contract.

"It's not going to be someone standing at the controls pressing buttons and flipping switches."A lawmaker who helped lead the opposition to the Dubai ports deal isn't so confident. Neither are some security experts. They question whether the U.S. should pay a foreign company with ties to China to keep radioactive material out of the United States."Giving a no-bid contract to a foreign company to carry out the most sensitive security screening for radioactive materials at ports abroad raises many questions," said Sen. Charles Schumer (news, bio, voting record), D-N.Y.A low-paid employee with access to the screening equipment could frustrate international security by studying how the equipment works and which materials set off its alarms, warned a retired U.S. Customs investigator who specialized in smuggling cases.

"Money buys a lot of things," Robert Sheridan said. "The fact that foreign workers would have access to how the United States screens various containers for nuclear material and how this technology scrutinizes the containers — all those things allow someone with a nefarious intention to thwart the screening."Other experts discounted concerns. They cited Hutchison's reputation as a leading ports company and said the United States inevitably must rely for some security on large commercial operators in the global maritime industry.

"We must not allow an unwarranted fear of foreign ownership or involvement in offshore operations to impair our ability to protect against nuclear weapons being smuggled into this country," said Sen. Norm Coleman (news, bio, voting record), R-Minn., a member of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. "We must work with these foreign companies.

"A former Coast Guard commander, Stephen Flynn, said foreign companies sometimes prove more trustworthy — and susceptible to U.S. influence — than governments."It's a very fragile system," Flynn said. Foreign companies "recognize the U.S. has the capacity and willingness to exercise a kill switch if something goes wrong."A spokesman for Hutchison's ports subsidiary, Anthony Tam, said the company "is a strong supporter in port security initiatives."

"In the case of the Bahamas, our local personnel are working alongside with U.S. customs officials to identify and inspect U.S.-bound containers that could be carrying radioactive materials," Tam said.However, there are no U.S. customs agents checking any cargo containers at the Hutchison port in Freeport. Under the contract, no U.S. officials would be stationed permanently in the Bahamas with the radiation scanner.The administration is finalizing the contract amid a national debate over maritime security sparked by the furor over now-abandoned plans by Dubai-owned DP World to take over significant operations at major U.S. ports.Hutchison operates the sprawling Freeport Container Port on Grand Bahama Island.

Its subsidiary, Hutchison Port Holdings, has operations in more than 20 countries but none in the United States.Contract documents, obtained by The Associated Press, indicate Hutchison will be paid roughly $6 million. The contract is for one year with options for three years.The Energy Department's National Nuclear Security Administration is negotiating the Bahamas contract under a $121 million security program it calls the "second line of defense." Wilkes, the NNSA spokesman, said the Bahamian government dictated that the U.S. give the contract to Hutchison.

"It's their country, their port. The driver of the mobile carrier is the contractor selected by their government. We had no say or no choice," he said. "We are fortunate to have allies who are signing these agreements with us."Some security experts said that is a weak explanation in the Bahamas, with its close reliance on the United States. The administration could insist that the Bahamas permit U.S. Customs agents to operate at the port, said Albert Santoli, an expert on national security issues in Asia and the Pacific.

"Why would they not accept that?" said Santoli, a former national security aide to Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (news, bio, voting record), R-Calif. "There is an interest in the Bahamas and every other country in the region to make sure the U.S. stays safe and strong. That's how this should be negotiated."Flynn, the former Coast Guard commander, agreed the Bahamas would readily accept such a proposal but said the U.S. is short of trained customs agents to send overseas.

Contract documents obtained by the AP show at least one other foreign company is involved in the U.S. radiation-detection program.A separate, no-bid $4 million contract the Bush administration is negotiating would pay a Manila-based company, International Container Terminal Services Inc., to install radiation detectors at the Philippines' largest port.The U.S. says the Manila company is not being paid to operate the radiation monitors once they are installed.

But two International Container executives and a senior official at the government's Philippine Nuclear Research Institute said the company will run the detectors on behalf of the institute and the country's customs bureau. U.S. officials said they will investigate further how the Filipinos plan to use the equipment.