Been Shafted - Contact Me

WELCOME TO THE NO BS ZONE OF TEDDY JACOBSON


MUST SEE
www.truthaboutparts.blogspot.com

Subject: wrong extractor cover up
From: robin moss
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 11:21:01 -0800 (PST)

go to www.truthaboutparts.blogspot.com

To: claudio@briley.com
Good day Mr. Salassa, I'm e-mailing you concerning my 1991-A1 pistol I picked up from Briley's yesterday. I am extremly disapointed. I brought in my pistol and a Cylinder & slide extractor to be fitted, after I got the call that my pistol was ready, I promptly came in to pick it up. I quickly noticed the extractor in the slide was NOT the extractor I brought in to be fitted. I pointed this out to my salesman (Russel) who after going to ask what happened, told me that mine was lost.

I understand things happen, but not calling me to ask what I would like to do, I can't understand. Someone could have called and explaind what happend and which extractor did I get from C&S. Instead, someone just stuck another one in my slide. If I had not noticed it, Briley's would have let me walk right out the door with it. Russel ( who I do not blame [I feel bad for him being in the middle]) did offer to reorder a new one from C&S. But whats ! to stop the same thing from happening again (if the extractor you put in had been blue instead of stainless I would have not noticed) .

I was so upset from someone trying to decive me I paid my bill and picked my pistol anyway. Today I will order a new spring steel extractor from C&S AGAIN, so I can have what I want installed in my pistol. I can't understand why a worldclass pistolsmith would do something like this. Now I am out $36.00 for the extractor and shipping plus $45.00 for the fitting of an extractor that I have no use for. And most important I'm out of trust in Briley's. This did not have to be this way if someone had been honest and called when my extractor came up missing. Good day & Good luck in 2006 allen!

taz2066@sbcglobal.net

CONTINUED TUESDAY 4-11-06 / 9 am central time

WE ARE GOING TO ADD ANOTHER DIMENSION TO MY HONEST BLOGGERS TO PROTECT THE HARD EARNED WORKER FROM THE FRAUDS IN THE GUN BUSINESS.

I HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF THIS ROTTEN BS AND RIPPING OFF THE HARD WORKING AMERICAN TO LAST A LIFETIME. WE ARE GOING TO EXPOSE THESE FRAUDS ONCE AND FOR ALL.

I DO NOT CARE WHO THEY ARE AS I FEAR NO ONE AND ANSWER TO ONLY MY G-D AND LOVE OF COUNTRY. ITS GOTTEN ME SICK WHAT I HAVE SEEN PEOPLE DO TO YOUR GUNS BECAUSE OF THEIR GREED FOR BENJAMIN FRANKLIN.

IF YOU HAVE AN HONEST COMPLAINT REGARDLESS OF WHO IT IS AGAINST, PLEASE EMAIL ME AT tjacobson@houston.rr.com keep it short and sweet.
or call me on my land line most any day after 10 am central time 281 565 6977..... YOU MUST SEE www.truthaboutparts.blogspot.com


ITS ABOUT TIME SOME ONE STOOD UP TO THESE FRAUDS THAT HAVE NO REGARD FOR YOUR LIFE AND THOSE OF YOUR FAMILY. I MOST CERTAINLY CARE AND AT THIS POINT IN TIME I HAVE SEEN AND HAD ENOUGH OF THEIR LIES AND DECEIT.

YOU MUST PLAY IT STRAIGHT WITH ME AND TELL ME THE HONEST TRUTH OR I WILL NOT HELP YOU. I GET UP TO 1200 HITS PER DAY AND THE BEST WAY TO STOP ALL THIS BS IS TO MAKE IT PUBLIC REGARDLESS OF WHO IS RIPPING YOU OFF.


We are living in a world of almost 6 billion people and this world has approx. 160 countries and is run by about 115 elite people that are "TRYING" to control your destiny. Things are not going very well for them at this point in time and there is nothing more they would like than to reduce the amount of people. Lets move on to guns.

I want to explain to you how a gunsmith gets his license, all he must do is comply with BATF standards and get a class 01 Federal Firearms License which is the very same license that any gun store is required to obtain. There are no other specific requirements for the owner of a class 01 FFL to have in order to work as a Gunsmith or Pistolsmith.

You should not allow just any flunkie with illusions of him or her being the great hope for the future in the SMITHING WORLD. You can not just allow anyone to work on your handgun or rifle as your life and that of your family depend on his or her expertise. I am trying to save you a great deal of heart ache. If a person is a machinist/gunsmith that does not mean he has the attention to detail or the ability to work with his hands like the old world craftsmen.

You are playing with your life. Even if a person works in a gun factory or a custom gun shop that does not mean he has the gift of being an old world craftsman that paid his or her dues by learning what QUALITY MEANS. Webster defines quality as THE DEGREE OF EXCELLENCE. Most of these workers on guns have no clue what the word quality means. Of course this is where I am going to make a lot more friends, but your safety must come first. Many factory workers get low pay and some private shops pay their armorers COMISSION ONLY.

Always ask if the person that is going to work on your carry gun does it full time and ask to see his or her resume. Many wannabbeee smiths think they can get to the top of the mountain with their helicopter after a year or two working on these guns. I suggest that they do not quit their day job. Most Smiths only work part time as it is very difficult to make a living as a Gunsmith. You certainly can not believe what publications generally write because they must cater to advertising money that keeps their jobs intact.

There are some very decent honest gun writers and they are hand cuffed as to how much truth they can tell as the big shot know it all editors will not print the absolute truth and risk losing their advertising money. After all how will the editor be able to afford his 2000 dollar Armani suits that he or she wears. I had a call from a gun writer about two weeks ago that was looking for free work and when I told him I am semi retired and if I helped him it would cost him money out of his pocket, he never called back which I knew he would not. This world is full of free loaders...

I want you to use caution before you just let anyone work on your gun. Remember unless you have a solid reliable handgun you will become a victim as this world to me is like a run away train with no brakes and no engineer. Get your priorities right before its too late. Do it now.

My associate Mr. Lewis and I will help those that need help and you can go to www.truthaboutparts.blogspot.com this is only a small drop in the bucket of what we know. I will not help anyone that will not allow us to use their real name along with the proper documentation.

If you think you have gotten superb work from a factory armorer it could be cause you do not know any better. In order to evaluate a persons work you must have seen the BEFORE AS WELL AS THE AFTER FROM A REAL CRAFTSMAN WITH THE ATTENTION TO DETAIL THAT IS VERY NECESSARY.

Thanks for reading my commentaries.

Read honest truthful articles written by Stephen Camp at www.hipowersandhandguns.com Mr. Camp is my friend and he can not be bought, he writes the truth and his books are superb.

Teddy

INTERESTED IN NAA GUARDIAN

MUST SEE www.gun-tests.com



www.defensereview.com/article326.html


http://defensetech.org/



www.jtf.org

www.rabbiyess.com

www.kolisrael.com

www.thetrumpet.com

www.hallindsey.com

DISCLAIMER: THIS COMMENTARY AS WELL AS ALL (6 Bloggers) MY PREVIOUS COMMENTARIES ARE MY PERSONAL OPINION AND MY PERSONAL VIEWPOINT ONLY. WHEN I QUOTE SOME ONE IT IS COPIED AND PASTED FROM A PUBLIC DOMAIN OF ONE KIND OR ANOTHER. I DO PAY FOR SOME DETAILED INTELLIGENCE REPORTS THAT I SHARE WITH YOU. IF YOU CAN NOT DEAL WITH REALITY, PLEASE LEAVE NOW.

www.actionsbyt.com/

www.actionsbyt.blogspot.com/

www.tacticalknives.blogspot.com/

www.commentsbyt.blogspot.com/

www.tjofsugarland.blogspot.com/

www.truthaboutparts.blogspot.com/

www.handgunpartsforsale.blogspot.com/





www.thetrumpet.com

Germany: “Europe’s Driving Force”
Monday, April 10, 2006

Germany’s economic resurgence has been confirmed by figures from the first quarter of 2006 and carries historic implications.Back in January, statistics showed that Germany was regaining strength economically.

One think tank said it was regaining its traditional role as the core European power—and that 2006 was Germany’s year. More recent statistics confirm these forecasts.“Germany has finally turned the corner and appears to be on the way to regaining its role as the motor of the European economy, analysts say. … Business confidence hit a 15-year high and unemployment dipped below the 5-million mark. … The most spectacular indication of a sustained upswing came from the ifo business climate index, which surged to 105.4 points in March—the highest since April 1991, the year after German unification, and up from 103.4 points in February” (EUbusiness.com, April 1).Since January, economists have reported a remarkable upswing in the German economy.

Now, the gap between business confidence and consumer confidence is closing, analysts report. “Germany’s upswing has started to reach the long-depressed consumer,” said an expert in Frankfurt. “German consumers have apparently started to open their purses at least a little bit more than before.”Europe is already beginning to look to the success in Germany. The European Central Bank considers Germany’s growth strong enough that in December 2005 it raised interest rates for the first time in five years.

More recently, the European Commission announced March 31 that “eurozone confidence was at its highest point since mid-2001 after reaching 104.8 points in March” (ibid.).The future of European unification is inextricably bound up with the fortunes of its largest, most powerful member. The real political, military and economic engine of Europe will be Germany. That is where we must keep our eyes fixed.History tells us that when Germany is strong, it has always been able to thrust its will on the rest of the Continent—especially when it works in tandem with the Vatican.

Notice this statement from Stratfor: “When Germany is weak … other powers are able to rise and assert their interests. But when Germany is strong, it dominates the heart of the Continent and relegates its neighbors to powerlessness—until such time as they ally to crush it” (January 16).This pattern has occurred at three major points in history—the three German “Reichs.” “Charlemagne’s Holy Roman Empire (the first iteration of what is now ‘Germany’) dominated Europe until it fell in Europe’s religious wars.

Its death is what allowed Britain, France and Russia to rise as major powers. Imperial Germany played a similar dominating role from its rise in 1870 until its fall in World War i, when Weimar Germany’s weakness allowed a French and Russian renaissance. And of course Nazi Germany’s rise again put all eyes on Berlin, and its destruction led to the superpower standoff—and, eventually, to the rise of a ‘united’ Europe” (ibid.).Stratfor predicts “2006 will mark a new turning point as Germany begins to ascend for a fourth time.”The Fourth Reich is rising before our eyes.This development will prove to be instrumental in bringing Europe together.

The trouble is, a Europe united under Germany will mean a superfederalist state that serves Germany’s interests.For more on Germany’s role in uniting Europe, read our free booklet Germany and the Holy Roman Empire.




TOP STORY

U.S. invasion an inside job?

Elite globalists, multinationals encourage border breakdown

Publishing Date: 01.04.06 19:39

WASHINGTON – While the U.S. Congress debates various plans to deal with illegal immigration and border security, if the president and the Council on Foreign Relations get their way, the U.S. is just four years away from economic and security integration with Mexico.

The blueprint for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter" is spelled out in a CFR report “Building a North American Community,” sponsored by the biggest agribusiness concern in the world, Archer Daniels Midland Company, Merrill Lynch & Co. and Yves-Andre Istel of Rothschild Inc. What President Bush, his counterparts in Mexico and Canada and the internationalists at the CFR envision is the creation of a "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital and people flow freely."

The CFR's strategy calls specifically for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people." It calls for laying "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." It calls for the participating nations to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations." It calls for us to "harmonize entry screening." The 59-page manifesto for merger points out that Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal March 23, 2005, when they met in Texas.

Go figure.

There are laws against entering the U.S. without authorization.

There are laws against staying here without permission.

There are laws against working here without a visa.

There are laws against hiring illegal foreign aliens.

Nevertheless, there are between 12 million and 20 million illegal aliens residing in the U.S. today.

Today, more new immigration and border-control laws are being proposed and debated in the Congress, even while the old laws go unenforced.

While, in the wake of a public uproar over illegal immigration, Congress is considering tightening up border policies, a kind of “shadow government” appears determined to make it even easier for border crossings in the next four years.

While the CFR report states plainly that the North American Free Trade Agreement has not been the panacea for job creation in Mexico that many of its staunchest proponents suggested, clearly the same forces that pushed it through are promoting the new “North American Community.”

Take Archer Daniels Midland Corp., for example. ADM – sometimes arrogantly referring to itself in commercials as “the breadbasket to the world” – was a major proponent of NAFTA and, as mentioned, is one of the corporate sponsors of the CFR report.

ADM has also been called the “most prominent recipient of corporate welfare in recent U.S. history.” ADM plants its seeds of hundreds of thousands of dollars with politicians in both political parties at election time then later manages to reap harvests of billions of dollars in government deals.

What is the corrosive influence of ADM on U.S. politicians? How does it work? Take Sen. Sam Brownback, for example, a major recipient of ADM cash. He’s a Republican from Kansas – just like Bob Dole before him. In supporting the latest “guest worker” program some are calling “amnesty lite,” Brownback explained that his position was really motivated by his own Christian compassion.

“This is also about the hallmark of a compassionate society,” he explained, “what you do with the widows, the orphans and the foreigners among you.”

But it displacing Mexican workers with unfair competition and exploiting them in the U.S. a show of compassion?

At least 43 percent of ADM’s profits come from products subsidized by U.S. taxpayers. And those profits are substantial indeed.

While the average migrant farmworker in the U.S. earns $7,500 per year, ADM reaped $1.7 billion in profits in 2003.

And while NAFTA has been a boon to ADM, it has actually dramatically hurt Mexican family farmers and driven many to the desperate decision to become migrant farmworkers – and illegal aliens – in the U.S.

According to some studies, some 1.8 million small farmers in Mexico have been driven from their land since NAFTA. They have, in some cases, become factory workers, in others field hands in the U.S. Some analysts see as many as 15 million more Mexican farmers being displaced in the coming years.

While NAFTA was actually billed as a cure of illegal immigration, no one can argue that illegal immigration has skyrocketed in its wake.
In 2001, the United Nations estimated that Mexicans experienced a 39 percent drop in their purchasing power since NAFTA. The price of tortillas, which provide 59 percent of the Mexican population’s caloric intake – has risen 40 percent over and above inflation since NAFTA went into effect in 1994.

Mexican farmers are being squeezed out of business by U.S. agribusiness concerns dumping massive amounts of the grain into the Mexican economy. This U.S. corn is grown with 40 percent subsidies by the U.S. taxpayers, while Mexico dropped its small subsidies of farmers with the enactment of NAFTA.

Here are some horrifying statistics to drive point the home that Mexican peasants are far worse off 12 years after NAFTA than they were before.

In the last six years, Mexican households subsisting below poverty levels – living on the equivalent of $60 a month – went from 60 percent to 76 percent. This, while the Mexican economy is said to be “growing.”
What is happening in the agrarian society of Mexico, as a result of NAFTA, is similar to what is happening to the manufacturing base in the U.S. under open trade policies. Mexico must now import corn – the staple of its diet. And ADM and other multinational corporations are only to happy to dump as much corn in the marketplace as possible.

But Mexico will not be able to feed itself in the future as a result. Its got cheaper corn, but the average Mexican has fewer pesos to buy it with.
Nothing is manufactured in the U.S. any more. The stores are filled with cheap products manufactured in China. Americans like the cheap products, but would they not like some manufacturing jobs even better.
Meanwhile, President Bush says the illegals entering the U.S. perform a valuable service – doing jobs Americans just wouldn’t be willing to do. Actually, Americans have always been willing to do those jobs, just not for the wages being offered. Are Americans really benefiting from food produced much more inexpensively as a result of the illegal alien labor? Actually not.

It has been estimated that if all illegal alien farm labor was replaced with higher-priced (minimum wage) U.S. labor, the cost of food for a family of five would rise by about $50 a year.

Many Americans would consider that $50 an absolute bargain if it means holding on to their culture, reducing taxes, cutting the cost of medical care, saving money on schools and keeping English as the common language.